|
|
|
|
|
| Copp, G. H.; Godard, M. J.; Russell, I. C.; Peeler, E. J.; Gherardi, F.; Tricarico, E.; Miossec, Laurence; Goulletquer, Philippe; Almeida, D.; Britton, J. R.; Vilizzi, L.; Mumford, J.; Williams, C.; Reading, A.; Rees, E. M. A.; Merino-aguirre, R.. |
| Developed for carrying out risk assessments under the European Commission (EC) Council Regulation No 708/2007 concerning the use of alien and locally absent species in aquaculture (ASR), the European Non-native Species in Aquaculture Risk Assessment Scheme (ENSARS) is briefly summarised, and the ‘Organism’ module is applied to the 24 species listed in ASR's Annex IV. Four other ENSARS modules (Infectious Agent, Facility, Pathway, and Socio-economic) were used to assess two case study species (European catfish Silurus glanis L. and red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii Girard). No Annex IV species was categorised as low risk, 10 as moderately low risk, 12 as medium risk, two as moderately high risk and none as high risk. The results are discussed and... |
| Tipo: Text |
Palavras-chave: Aquaculture; Biological invasions; Decision support; ENSARS; EU legislation; Risk analysis. |
| Ano: 2016 |
URL: http://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00189/30032/29433.pdf |
| |
|
|
| Mumford, J.. |
| To allocate biosecurity resources efficiently and effectively it is necessary to be able to systematically estimate and describe risks from a wide range of threats and mitigation measures. A common framework for conducting risk assessments is an essential tool for setting national priorities and for making decisions that will justify actions to international trading partners. Two systems, one quantitative and one that combines qualitative and quantitative elements, are presented as examples of such a systematic approach |
| Tipo: Conference proceedings |
|
| Ano: 2007 |
URL: http://library.wur.nl/ojs/index.php/frontis/article/view/1288 |
| |
|
|
|
